Skip to content

Study · Not a test of the peptide alone · 1984

2 results

Purification of [125I]-vasoactive intestinal peptide by reverse-phase HPLC.

Paul S, Wood K, Said SI

Peptides1 Nov 1984Cited by 19 (Europe PMC)

Summary

The text of this summary is not shown here, because the article license does not allow reuse. Read it at the source (opens in a new tab)

Text rights: Publisher copyright. Results still quote short attributed sentences.

Results from this study2

No result from this study comes from a test of the peptide.

Studies that did not test the peptide alone2

In this study, Vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP, aviptadil) was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. These results are not evidence about taking Vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP, aviptadil).

  1. 01LabNot a test of Vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP, aviptadil) aloneIn vitro (cell-free)Other

    Reverse-phase HPLC gave 125I-VIP with a specific activity of 1.99 +/- 0.21 Ci/mumole, close to the maximum for monoiodinated VIP.

    In plain wordsIn lab work, purified radiolabelled VIP reached a specific activity close to the maximum possible.

    Outcome
    Not applicableSpecific activity of HPLC-purified 125I-VIP
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    125I-VIP preparation
    Outcome group
    Analytical methods and detection · Pharmacology

    Measurements

    specific activity
    1.99 Ci/mumole
    125I-VIP

    Source sentences

    Summary
    The specific activity of the 125I-VIP was 1.99 +/- 0.21 Ci/mumole, approaching the maximum specific activity of monoiodinated VIP (2.26 Ci/mumole).

    In this study, Vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP, aviptadil) was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP, aviptadil).

  2. 02LabNot a test of Vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP, aviptadil) aloneIn vitro (cell-free)Other

    Radioimmunoassay and radioreceptorassay for VIP were 2.6-fold and 2.5-fold more sensitive with HPLC-purified 125I-VIP than with 125I-VIP from an open-end cellulose column.

    In plain wordsIn lab tests, VIP assays were more sensitive with HPLC-purified radiolabelled VIP than with VIP from a cellulose column.

    Outcome
    IncreaseSensitivity of radioimmunoassay and radioreceptorassay for VIP
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    125I-VIP preparation
    Comparator
    125I-VIP from an open-end cellulose column
    Outcome group
    Analytical methods and detection · Pharmacology

    Measurements

    radioimmunoassay sensitivity gain
    2.6-fold
    HPLC-purified vs cellulose column
    radioreceptorassay sensitivity gain
    2.5-fold
    HPLC-purified vs cellulose column

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Radioimmunoassay and radioreceptorassay for VIP were more sensitive (2.6-fold, and 2.5-fold, respectively) using 125I-VIP purified by HPLC compared to 125I-VIP obtained from an open-end cellulose column.

    In this study, Vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP, aviptadil) was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP, aviptadil).

AI wrote and checked these results. AI can make mistakes, so check important results against the source.

Version history

PepBank keeps every version of the data on this study. Status changes from Retraction Watch, Europe PMC and Crossref are listed with their source.

  1. Version 2Current

    12 Oct 2026, 12:58 UTC

    Study results updated

  2. Version 1

    9 Oct 2026, 12:41 UTC

    First added · source update from Europe PMC

Subjects

Terms as the source lists them.

PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.