Skip to content

Study · Animal study (in vivo) · cat · 1987

6 results

The effect of subcutaneous administration of delta sleep-inducing peptide (DSIP) on some parameters of sleep in the cat.

Susić V

Physiology & behavior1 Jan 1987Cited by 3 (Europe PMC)

Summary

The text of this summary is not shown here, because the article license does not allow reuse. Read it at the source (opens in a new tab)

Text rights: Publisher copyright. Results still quote short attributed sentences.

Results from this study6

6 results from studies that gave the peptide. No result from this study comes from people.

  1. 01AnimalAnimal study (in vivo)Efficacy outcome

    In cats, subcutaneous DSIP significantly increased deep slow-wave sleep.

    In plain wordsIn cats, DSIP injected under the skin increased deep slow-wave sleep.

    Outcome
    IncreaseDeep slow-wave sleep (DSWS)
    Study

    catn = 8

    Comparator
    Ringer injection
    Outcome group
    Sleep · Sleep
    Studied dose
    120 nmol/kg · subcutaneousAs given in this study (cat).

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Delta sleep inducing peptide (DSIP) significantly increases deep-slow-wave sleep (DSWS) of cats after subcutaneous (SC) injection.
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    Cats (n = 8) were SC injected with DSIP (120 nmol.kg-1) prior to polygraphic recording of EEG combined with electro-oculography, EOG) and electromyography (EMG) for 8 hours.
  2. 02AnimalAnimal study (in vivo)Efficacy outcome

    In cats, subcutaneous DSIP significantly increased slow waves (delta sleep) in the sleep EEG.

    In plain wordsIn cats, DSIP injected under the skin increased slow brain waves typical of deep sleep.

    Outcome
    IncreaseSlow waves (delta sleep) in sleep EEG
    Study

    catn = 8

    Comparator
    Ringer injection
    Outcome group
    Sleep · Sleep
    Studied dose
    120 nmol/kg · subcutaneousAs given in this study (cat).

    Source sentences

    Summary
    DSIP was found to significantly increase slow-waves (delta sleep) in the sleep EEG.
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    Cats (n = 8) were SC injected with DSIP (120 nmol.kg-1) prior to polygraphic recording of EEG combined with electro-oculography, EOG) and electromyography (EMG) for 8 hours.
  3. 03AnimalAnimal study (in vivo)Efficacy outcome

    In cats, DSIP showed a tendency to reduce waking time, but the difference from control was not statistically significant.

    In plain wordsIn cats, DSIP did not significantly change waking time compared with a control injection.

    Outcome
    No significant changeWaking time
    Study

    catn = 8

    Comparator
    Ringer injection
    Outcome group
    Sleep · Sleep
    Studied dose
    120 nmol/kg · subcutaneousAs given in this study (cat).

    Source sentences

    Summary
    There was a tendency to reduced waking time and a prolongation of slow wave sleep time, and a shortening of sleep onset and REM sleep latencies but the differences from control (Ringer injection) were not statistically significant.
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    Cats (n = 8) were SC injected with DSIP (120 nmol.kg-1) prior to polygraphic recording of EEG combined with electro-oculography, EOG) and electromyography (EMG) for 8 hours.
  4. 04AnimalAnimal study (in vivo)Efficacy outcome

    In cats, the prolongation of slow wave sleep time after DSIP was not statistically significant versus control.

    In plain wordsIn cats, DSIP did not significantly lengthen slow wave sleep compared with a control injection.

    Outcome
    No significant changeSlow wave sleep time
    Study

    catn = 8

    Comparator
    Ringer injection
    Outcome group
    Sleep · Sleep
    Studied dose
    120 nmol/kg · subcutaneousAs given in this study (cat).

    Source sentences

    Summary
    There was a tendency to reduced waking time and a prolongation of slow wave sleep time, and a shortening of sleep onset and REM sleep latencies but the differences from control (Ringer injection) were not statistically significant.
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    Cats (n = 8) were SC injected with DSIP (120 nmol.kg-1) prior to polygraphic recording of EEG combined with electro-oculography, EOG) and electromyography (EMG) for 8 hours.
  5. 05AnimalAnimal study (in vivo)Efficacy outcome

    In cats, the shortening of sleep onset and REM sleep latencies after DSIP was not statistically significant versus control.

    In plain wordsIn cats, DSIP did not significantly shorten the time to fall asleep or to start REM sleep compared with a control injection.

    Outcome
    No significant changeSleep onset and REM sleep latencies
    Study

    catn = 8

    Comparator
    Ringer injection
    Outcome group
    Sleep · Sleep
    Studied dose
    120 nmol/kg · subcutaneousAs given in this study (cat).

    Source sentences

    Summary
    There was a tendency to reduced waking time and a prolongation of slow wave sleep time, and a shortening of sleep onset and REM sleep latencies but the differences from control (Ringer injection) were not statistically significant.
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    Cats (n = 8) were SC injected with DSIP (120 nmol.kg-1) prior to polygraphic recording of EEG combined with electro-oculography, EOG) and electromyography (EMG) for 8 hours.
  6. 06AnimalAnimal study (in vivo)Efficacy outcome

    In cats, DSIP did not change the amount of REM sleep.

    In plain wordsIn cats, DSIP did not change the amount of REM sleep.

    Outcome
    No significant changeREM sleep amount
    Study

    catn = 8

    Comparator
    Ringer injection
    Outcome group
    Sleep · Sleep
    Studied dose
    120 nmol/kg · subcutaneousAs given in this study (cat).

    Source sentences

    Summary
    There was no change in the amount of REM sleep.
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    Cats (n = 8) were SC injected with DSIP (120 nmol.kg-1) prior to polygraphic recording of EEG combined with electro-oculography, EOG) and electromyography (EMG) for 8 hours.

AI wrote and checked these results. AI can make mistakes, so check important results against the source.

Version history

PepBank keeps every version of the data on this study. Status changes from Retraction Watch, Europe PMC and Crossref are listed with their source.

  1. Version 2Current

    10 Oct 2026, 09:43 UTC

    Study results updated

  2. Version 1

    9 Oct 2026, 03:04 UTC

    First added · source update from Europe PMC

Subjects

Terms as the source lists them.

PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.