Skip to content

Study · Not a test of the peptide alone · 1987

1 result

An enzyme immunoassay for synthetic thymulin.

Métreau E, Pléau JM, Dardenne M, Bach JF, Pradelles P

Journal of immunological methods1 Sept 1987Cited by 23 (Europe PMC)

Summary

The text of this summary is not shown here, because the article license does not allow reuse. Read it at the source (opens in a new tab)

Text rights: Publisher copyright. Results still quote short attributed sentences.

Results from this study1

No result from this study comes from a test of the peptide.

Studies that did not test the peptide alone1

In this study, Thymosin alpha-1 was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. These results are not evidence about taking Thymosin alpha-1.

  1. 01LabNot a test of Thymosin alpha-1 aloneIn vitro (cell-free)Activity measurement

    Thymosin alpha‑1 did not cross-react in the thymulin enzyme immunoassay.

    In plain wordsIn lab tests, thymosin alpha‑1 did not give a false signal in a test built to detect thymulin.

    Outcome
    No significant changeCross-reactivity of thymosin alpha 1 in thymulin enzyme immunoassay
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Outcome group
    Analytical methods and detection · Pharmacology

    Source sentences

    Summary
    other thymic hormones, thymosin alpha 1 and thymopoietin II (or TP5) and unrelated short peptides do not cross-react with thymulin.
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    We established an enzyme immunoassay (EIA) for synthetic zinc-free thymulin with a thymulin-acetylcholinesterase conjugate as tracer and specific polyclonal rabbit antithymulin antibodies.

    In this study, Thymosin alpha-1 was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Thymosin alpha-1.

AI wrote and checked these results. AI can make mistakes, so check important results against the source.

Version history

PepBank keeps every version of the data on this study. Status changes from Retraction Watch, Europe PMC and Crossref are listed with their source.

  1. Versions 4 to 5Current

    21 Oct 2026, 13:55 UTC

    The same notice was added 2 times, first on 21 Oct 2026, 12:50 UTC. The status did not change between them.

    Study data updated · source update from Europe PMC

  2. Version 3

    10 Oct 2026, 08:55 UTC

    Study results updated

  3. Version 2

    9 Oct 2026, 03:03 UTC

    Study data updated · source update from Europe PMC

  4. Version 1

    9 Oct 2026, 03:02 UTC

    First added · source update from Europe PMC

Subjects

Terms as the source lists them.

PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.