Skip to content

Study · Non-randomized trial · n = 17 · 1989

6 results

Nasal calcitonin for treatment of established osteoporosis.

Overgaard K, Riis BJ, Christiansen C, Pødenphant J, Johansen JS

Clinical endocrinology1 Apr 1989Cited by 110 (Europe PMC)

Summary

The text of this summary is not shown here, because the article license does not allow reuse. Read it at the source (opens in a new tab)

Text rights: Publisher copyright. Results still quote short attributed sentences.

Results from this study6

6 results from studies that gave the peptide. 6 results from people.

  1. 01HumanNon-randomized trialActivity measurement

    In women with osteoporosis, bone resorption estimates decreased during salmon calcitonin treatment (P less than 0.001).

    In plain wordsIn women with osteoporosis, bone resorption estimates decreased during salmon calcitonin treatment.

    Outcome
    DecreaseBone resorption estimates
    Study

    n = 17

    Outcome group
    Bone and joint · Musculoskeletal
    Studied dose
    200 IU daily · nasal · one yearAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    P value
    < 0.001
    calcitonin group

    Source sentences

    Summary
    The biochemical estimates of both bone resorption and bone formation decreased highly significantly in the calcitonin group (P less than 0.001) and were unchanged in the control group, whereas the placebo (calcium) group showed intermediate values.
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Thirty-seven women with established osteoporosis completed a one-year double-blind, placebo-controlled study with the primary aim of examining the effect of nasal salmon calcitonin (200 IU daily) on bone and calcium metabolism.
    Summary · context
    All the women received a daily calcium supplement of 500 mg.
  2. 02HumanNon-randomized trialActivity measurement

    In women with osteoporosis, bone formation estimates decreased during salmon calcitonin treatment (P less than 0.001).

    In plain wordsIn women with osteoporosis, bone formation estimates decreased during salmon calcitonin treatment.

    Outcome
    DecreaseBone formation estimates
    Study

    n = 17

    Outcome group
    Bone and joint · Musculoskeletal
    Studied dose
    200 IU daily · nasal · one yearAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    P value
    < 0.001
    calcitonin group

    Source sentences

    Summary
    The biochemical estimates of both bone resorption and bone formation decreased highly significantly in the calcitonin group (P less than 0.001) and were unchanged in the control group, whereas the placebo (calcium) group showed intermediate values.
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Thirty-seven women with established osteoporosis completed a one-year double-blind, placebo-controlled study with the primary aim of examining the effect of nasal salmon calcitonin (200 IU daily) on bone and calcium metabolism.
    Summary · context
    All the women received a daily calcium supplement of 500 mg.
  3. 03HumanNon-randomized trialSafety outcome

    In women with osteoporosis, no subjective side effects occurred during salmon calcitonin treatment.

    In plain wordsIn women with osteoporosis, no subjective side effects occurred during salmon calcitonin treatment.

    Outcome
    Not applicableSubjective side effects
    Study

    n = 17

    Outcome group
    Adverse events · Whole body
    Studied dose
    200 IU daily · nasal · one yearAs given in this study (human).

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Neither subjective nor objective side-effects occurred in any of the groups.
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Thirty-seven women with established osteoporosis completed a one-year double-blind, placebo-controlled study with the primary aim of examining the effect of nasal salmon calcitonin (200 IU daily) on bone and calcium metabolism.
    Summary · context
    All the women received a daily calcium supplement of 500 mg.
  4. 04HumanNon-randomized trialSafety outcome

    In women with osteoporosis, no objective side effects occurred during salmon calcitonin treatment.

    In plain wordsIn women with osteoporosis, no objective side effects occurred during salmon calcitonin treatment.

    Outcome
    Not applicableObjective side effects
    Study

    n = 17

    Outcome group
    Adverse events · Whole body
    Studied dose
    200 IU daily · nasal · one yearAs given in this study (human).

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Neither subjective nor objective side-effects occurred in any of the groups.
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Thirty-seven women with established osteoporosis completed a one-year double-blind, placebo-controlled study with the primary aim of examining the effect of nasal salmon calcitonin (200 IU daily) on bone and calcium metabolism.
    Summary · context
    All the women received a daily calcium supplement of 500 mg.
  5. 05HumanNon-randomized trialEfficacy outcome

    In women with osteoporosis, the nasal salmon calcitonin group did not lose forearm bone mineral in comparison with the placebo and healthy control groups (P less than 0.01).

    In plain wordsIn women with osteoporosis, the nasal salmon calcitonin group did not lose forearm bone mineral in comparison with the placebo and healthy control groups.

    Outcome
    IncreaseForearm bone mineral preservation
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    Placebo (calcium) group and age-matched healthy control group
    Outcome group
    Bone and joint · Musculoskeletal
    Studied dose
    200 IU daily · nasal · one yearAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    P value
    < 0.01
    calcitonin versus placebo and control groups

    Source sentences

    Summary
    The calcitonin group (n = 17) did not lose bone mineral in comparison with the placebo (n = 20) and the control groups (n = 19) (P less than 0.01).
    3 context sentences
    Summary · context
    The bone mineral measured in the forearm (single photon absorptiometry) and spine (dual photon absorptiometry) showed a similar pattern during treatment.
    Summary · context
    Thirty-seven women with established osteoporosis completed a one-year double-blind, placebo-controlled study with the primary aim of examining the effect of nasal salmon calcitonin (200 IU daily) on bone and calcium metabolism.
    Summary · context
    All the women received a daily calcium supplement of 500 mg.
  6. 06HumanNon-randomized trialEfficacy outcome

    In women with osteoporosis, the nasal salmon calcitonin group did not lose spine bone mineral in comparison with the placebo and healthy control groups (P less than 0.01).

    In plain wordsIn women with osteoporosis, the nasal salmon calcitonin group did not lose spine bone mineral in comparison with the placebo and healthy control groups.

    Outcome
    IncreaseSpine bone mineral preservation
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    Placebo (calcium) group and age-matched healthy control group
    Outcome group
    Bone and joint · Musculoskeletal
    Studied dose
    200 IU daily · nasal · one yearAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    P value
    < 0.01
    calcitonin versus placebo and control groups

    Source sentences

    Summary
    The calcitonin group (n = 17) did not lose bone mineral in comparison with the placebo (n = 20) and the control groups (n = 19) (P less than 0.01).
    3 context sentences
    Summary · context
    The bone mineral measured in the forearm (single photon absorptiometry) and spine (dual photon absorptiometry) showed a similar pattern during treatment.
    Summary · context
    Thirty-seven women with established osteoporosis completed a one-year double-blind, placebo-controlled study with the primary aim of examining the effect of nasal salmon calcitonin (200 IU daily) on bone and calcium metabolism.
    Summary · context
    All the women received a daily calcium supplement of 500 mg.

AI wrote and checked these results. AI can make mistakes, so check important results against the source.

Version history

PepBank keeps every version of the data on this study. Status changes from Retraction Watch, Europe PMC and Crossref are listed with their source.

  1. Version 2Current

    28 Oct 2026, 02:03 UTC

    Study results updated

  2. Version 1

    27 Oct 2026, 16:35 UTC

    First added · source update from Europe PMC

Subjects

Terms as the source lists them.

PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.