Skip to content

Study · Not a test of the peptide alone · 1991

5 results

An antagonist to vasoactive intestinal peptide affects cellular functions in the central nervous system.

Gozes I, McCune SK, Jacobson L, Warren D, Moody TW, Fridkin M, Brenneman DE

The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics1 Jun 1991Cited by 101 (Europe PMC)

Summary

The text of this summary is not shown here, because the article license does not allow reuse. Read it at the source (opens in a new tab)

Text rights: Publisher copyright. Results still quote short attributed sentences.

Results from this study5

No result from this study comes from a test of the peptide.

Studies that did not test the peptide alone5

In this study, Vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP, aviptadil) was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. These results are not evidence about taking Vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP, aviptadil).

  1. 01LabNot a test of Vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP, aviptadil) aloneIn vitro (cells)Activity measurement

    In CNS cell cultures, a hybrid VIP-neurotensin antagonist displaced 80 to 90% of [125I]VIP binding.

    In plain wordsIn cells, a lab-made VIP blocker pushed 80 to 90% of labelled VIP off its binding sites. This tests the blocker.

    Outcome
    DecreaseDisplacement of [125I]VIP binding by the hybrid antagonist
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Cell cultures from cerebral cortex, hippocampus or spinal cord
    Outcome group
    Receptor activity and mechanism · Nervous system and cognition

    Measurements

    VIP binding displaced
    80 to 90%
    cerebral cortex, hippocampus or spinal cord cultures

    Source sentences

    Summary
    The hybrid antagonist displaced 80 to 90% of [125I]VIP binding to cell cultures from cerebral cortex, hippocampus or spinal cord.
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    A vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) antagonist was synthesized and used to investigate the interactions of VIP with its receptors present in the central nervous system (CNS).

    In this study, Vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP, aviptadil) was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP, aviptadil).

  2. 02LabNot a test of Vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP, aviptadil) aloneIn vitro (cells)Activity measurement

    In cortical astrocytes, the hybrid VIP antagonist had a Ki of 45 pM at one binding site and 74 nM at the other.

    In plain wordsIn cells, a lab-made VIP blocker bound two different sites on brain support cells, one very tightly and one more weakly.

    Outcome
    Not applicableAntagonist affinity (Ki) at two binding sites in cortical astrocytes
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Cell cultures from cerebral cortex, hippocampus or spinal cord
    Outcome group
    Receptor activity and mechanism · Nervous system and cognition

    Measurements

    Ki
    45 pM
    cortical astrocytes, high-affinity site
    Ki
    74 nM
    cortical astrocytes, low-affinity site

    Source sentences

    Summary
    In the case of cortical astrocytes, the antagonist had a Ki of 45 pM at one site and a Ki of 74 nM at the other.
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    A vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) antagonist was synthesized and used to investigate the interactions of VIP with its receptors present in the central nervous system (CNS).

    In this study, Vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP, aviptadil) was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP, aviptadil).

  3. 03LabNot a test of Vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP, aviptadil) aloneIn vitro (cells)Activity measurement

    At the lower affinity binding site, the hybrid antagonist was about 10-fold more potent than VIP in displacing radiolabeled VIP.

    In plain wordsIn cells, the lab-made blocker was about 10 times stronger than VIP at displacing labelled VIP from the weaker binding site.

    Outcome
    IncreaseAntagonist potency versus VIP at the lower affinity site
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Cell cultures from cerebral cortex, hippocampus or spinal cord
    Comparator
    VIP
    Outcome group
    Receptor activity and mechanism · Nervous system and cognition

    Measurements

    relative potency versus VIP
    10 fold
    lower affinity binding site

    Source sentences

    Summary
    At the lower affinity binding site, the antagonist was about 10-fold more potent than VIP in displacing radiolabeled VIP.
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    A vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) antagonist was synthesized and used to investigate the interactions of VIP with its receptors present in the central nervous system (CNS).

    In this study, Vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP, aviptadil) was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP, aviptadil).

  4. 04LabNot a test of Vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP, aviptadil) aloneIn vitro (cells)Activity measurement

    In cortical glia cultures, the hybrid antagonist decreased VIP-stimulated cAMP accumulation (EC50, 59 nM).

    In plain wordsIn cells, the lab-made blocker lowered the cAMP rise caused by VIP in brain support cells.

    Outcome
    DecreasecAMP accumulation in VIP-stimulated cortical glia
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Cell cultures from cerebral cortex, hippocampus or spinal cord
    Outcome group
    Receptor activity and mechanism · Nervous system and cognition

    Measurements

    EC50
    59 nM
    VIP-stimulated cortical glia cultures

    Source sentences

    Summary
    The accumulation of cyclic AMP (cAMP) in VIP-stimulated cortical glia cultures was decreased by the new antagonist (EC50, 59 nM).
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    A vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) antagonist was synthesized and used to investigate the interactions of VIP with its receptors present in the central nervous system (CNS).

    In this study, Vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP, aviptadil) was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP, aviptadil).

  5. 05LabNot a test of Vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP, aviptadil) aloneIn vitro (cells)Efficacy outcome

    In dissociated spinal cord cultures, 1 nM hybrid antagonist reduced neuronal cell counts by 42% compared with controls (EC50 about 30 pM).

    In plain wordsIn cells, adding a lab-made VIP blocker cut the number of spinal cord neurons by 42% compared with controls.

    Outcome
    DecreaseNeuronal cell counts in spinal cord cultures
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Cell cultures from cerebral cortex, hippocampus or spinal cord
    Comparator
    Controls
    Outcome group
    Neuroprotection · Nervous system and cognition

    Measurements

    neuronal cell count reduction
    42%
    1 nM antagonist
    EC50
    ≈ 30 pM
    spinal cord cultures

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Finally, the addition of 1 nM hybrid antagonist to dissociated spinal cord cultures resulted in a 42% reduction in neuronal cell counts as compared with controls, and the EC50 of this effect was about 30 pM, which corresponded closely to the Ki of antagonist displacement of [125I]VIP binding at the high-affinity site.
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    A vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) antagonist was synthesized and used to investigate the interactions of VIP with its receptors present in the central nervous system (CNS).

    In this study, Vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP, aviptadil) was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP, aviptadil).

AI wrote and checked these results. AI can make mistakes, so check important results against the source.

Version history

PepBank keeps every version of the data on this study. Status changes from Retraction Watch, Europe PMC and Crossref are listed with their source.

  1. Version 2Current

    12 Oct 2026, 12:58 UTC

    Study results updated

  2. Version 1

    9 Oct 2026, 12:41 UTC

    First added · source update from Europe PMC

Subjects

Terms as the source lists them.

PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.