Skip to content

AHK-Cu vs GHK-Cu

AHK-Cu and GHK-Cu are both copper peptides discussed for skin and hair, and neither is approved as a drug. GHK-Cu has many more studies, mostly in animals and lab cells with a few small studies in people, while AHK-Cu has only lab results so far. This page compares their results.

Comparing 2 peptides · Data version 308560

Swipe sideways to see every peptide.

Comparison of AHK-Cu (Ala-His-Lys copper complex), GHK-Cu
Peptide

Metal complex

GHK-Cu
Identity
KindMetal complexMetal complex
AreaSkin and hairRecovery and repair
Evidence
Amount of evidence6226 (plus 7 on natural levels, listed separately)
Evidence levelResults from lab studies onlyHas results from studies in people
Safety
Safety resultsNo safety results5 (0 in people)
Status
Approval
Sport (WADA)
Registered trialsNone registered1 · 1 active2 more mention it but do not test it

Shared outcomes

  • Skin and hair20

Approval and sport status

From the regulatory data of each peptide.

  • AHK-Cu (Ala-His-Lys copper complex)

    The FDA, the EMA and the other sources we use show no approval (as of 21 Oct 2026).

  • GHK-Cu

    Its most advanced trial is in phase 2. The FDA, the EMA and the other sources we use show no approval (as of 8 Oct 2026).

Amount of evidence by outcome

Outcome groups with study results for at least two of these peptides. Counts include only results from studies that gave the peptide. Bar length is the number of results, on one scale. The bars show how much was studied, not how large an effect was. A peptide with more studies can look stronger here without being stronger. For results, see the randomized results above.

Study results per shared outcome group and evidence class
Outcome groupAHK-Cu (Ala-His-Lys copper complex)GHK-Cu
Skin and hairSkin and wound

66

1477

PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.